Glasners Weg Wie Hasenhüttl Vorbild?

BREDO

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Dec 07, 2024

37 visitor like this post

Share

Glasners Weg: Wie Hasenhüttl Vorbild?

Ralph Hasenhüttl's success at Southampton and Leipzig, and now Adi Hütter's and Gerhard Struber's impact on various clubs, begs the question: is there a discernible "Weg" (path) these managers share? This article explores the similarities and differences in their coaching philosophies, tactical approaches, and overall management styles, examining whether Hasenhüttl truly serves as a blueprint for coaches like Glasner.

The Hasenhüttl Model: High-Intensity and Gegenpressing

Hasenhüttl's philosophy is built on a foundation of high-intensity pressing, relentless energy, and a dynamic, adaptable tactical system. His teams are known for their:

• Gegenpressing: Quickly winning the ball back after losing possession through immediate and coordinated pressing.
• Verticality: Swift transitions from defense to attack, prioritizing direct passing and exploiting space.
• Flexibility: Adapting formations and strategies based on the opponent's strengths and weaknesses. He's not tied to a rigid system.

This approach requires exceptional fitness and tactical understanding from his players. While incredibly effective when executed correctly, it also carries risks, potentially leaving the team exposed on the counter-attack if the press fails.

Glasner's Approach: Control and Tactical Discipline

While sharing some similarities with Hasenhüttl's style, Glasner's approach emphasizes control and tactical discipline more prominently. He favors:

• Possession-based football: Maintaining control of the ball through patient build-up play and intricate passing patterns.
• Structured formations: While adaptable, Glasner usually employs well-defined formations with clear roles and responsibilities for each player.
• Defensive solidity: Prioritizing a strong defensive structure to minimize chances for the opposition.

Comparing the "Weg": Similarities and Differences

Both Hasenhüttl and Glasner are known for their intense work ethic and demanding training regimes. They both foster a strong team spirit and demand total commitment from their players. However, their tactical approaches differ significantly. Hasenhüttl prioritizes high-intensity pressing and verticality, whereas Glasner leans towards possession-based football and controlled transitions.

Key Differences:

• Intensity vs. Control: Hasenhüttl's style is characterized by relentless energy and pressing, while Glasner prioritizes possession and control.
• Verticality vs. Patient Build-Up: Hasenhüttl's teams are known for their direct, swift attacks, whereas Glasner emphasizes patient build-up play.
• Flexibility vs. Structured Formations: While both adapt, Hasenhüttl shows more fluidity in his formation changes compared to Glasner's preference for structured systems.

Is Glasner Following Hasenhüttl's Path?

While there are some overlapping characteristics, it's inaccurate to say Glasner directly follows Hasenhüttl's path. They both are highly successful managers with distinct tactical philosophies. Glasner has carved his own niche, proving that success isn't tied to a single "Weg." The key takeaway is that both managers exemplify dedication, tactical awareness, and the ability to adapt to different circumstances and players. Their success showcases the importance of a strong work ethic and a clear coaching philosophy, regardless of specific tactical preferences.

The Importance of Individuality

Ultimately, a successful "Weg" isn't about blindly copying another coach's style. Rather, it's about developing a unique coaching identity based on individual strengths and adapting to the specific context of each team and league. Both Hasenhüttl and Glasner demonstrate that success can be achieved through different yet equally effective approaches. Their careers highlight the importance of understanding your own strengths and tailoring your approach accordingly.