Glasner: Der Neue Hasenhüttl? Analyse

BREDO

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Dec 07, 2024

37 visitor like this post

Share

Glasner: Der neue Hasenhüttl? Analyse

Ralph Hasenhüttl's tenure at Southampton, marked by energetic pressing and a distinctive gegenpressing style, left a lasting impression on the Premier League. Now, with numerous managers employing similar high-intensity tactics, the question arises: could Andi Glasner be the next Hasenhüttl? This analysis delves into the similarities and differences between the two coaches to explore the validity of this comparison.

Taktische Ähnlichkeiten: Pressing und Intensität

Both Hasenhüttl and Glasner are known for their intense, high-pressing styles. They demand relentless energy and commitment from their players, aiming to win back possession high up the pitch and quickly transition into attack. This aggressive approach relies heavily on fitness, tactical discipline, and a clear understanding of pressing triggers. While the specifics of their pressing systems might differ in nuances, the core philosophy of suffocating the opposition and forcing errors is strikingly similar.

Gemeinsamkeiten im Spielaufbau:

Both managers favor a direct style of play, bypassing midfield congestion whenever possible to exploit space behind the defensive line. This involves utilizing quick, incisive passes and exploiting the pace of their wingers and strikers. However, it's important to note that Glasner's approach might incorporate more positional play depending on the opponent and the game situation, demonstrating a greater tactical flexibility compared to Hasenhüttl's sometimes more rigid approach.

Unterschiede im Spielstil: Flexibilität und Anpassungsfähigkeit

While the high-pressing foundation is shared, significant differences exist. Hasenhüttl, during his time at Southampton, displayed a certain rigidity in his tactical approach. Glasner, on the other hand, demonstrates greater tactical flexibility. He adapts his system depending on the opponent, utilizing different formations and strategies to exploit weaknesses. This adaptability is a crucial factor separating the two managers.

Kadermanagement und Spielerentwicklung:

While both are known for their ability to get the best out of their players, their approaches to squad management might differ. Hasenhüttl often relied on a smaller core of trusted players, while Glasner shows a tendency to integrate younger talent into his system more readily. This difference might stem from their experiences and managerial philosophies.

Fazit: Ein Vergleich mit Einschränkungen

The comparison of Glasner to Hasenhüttl is valid in terms of their shared emphasis on high pressing and intensity. However, Glasner’s greater tactical flexibility and adaptability set him apart. Hasenhüttl's style, while effective at times, could be perceived as less versatile, potentially limiting his success in the long run.

While Glasner's career is still developing, his current successes suggest a manager capable of consistent high-level performance with a more nuanced approach than his predecessor. Whether he achieves the same level of sustained success as Hasenhüttl remains to be seen, but the comparison provides a useful framework for analyzing his managerial qualities and potential. Further analysis focusing on specific game situations and tactical adjustments would further refine this comparison. The underlying similarity, however, is undeniable: both managers represent a modern approach to football based on energy, intensity, and a commitment to proactive pressing.